Friday, January 16, 2015

Open Letter to Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings Regarding Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings Profiting from PORN? If not then they are allowing "trusted" children's Brands to be Tarnished. Either they Profit, BIGTIME, From Porn or they Look the Other Way While Superhero and Action Figure Porn Corrupts YOUR Children.

Attention Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, Liberty Media Holdings:

Regarding:   Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming "entertained" by Porn.

I am Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, I have reported extensively for over 3 years regarding the iViewit Technology and the infringement of the iViewit technology by those who signed NDA Agreements such as Warner Bros., as you know from previous disclosure letters send to you, asking that you notify auditors and shareholders.

http://crystalcox.blogspot.com/2013/03/twx-open-letter-to-time-warner-warner.html


I Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal L. Cox have recently named you in a RICO / Racketeering Complaint as you know, and surely have disclosed to your shareholders.

In being sued by Porn Attorney Marc Randazza over an alleged Trademark, and to shut down my blogs reporting on the iViewit Technology infringement, I have discovered that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics Trademarks are being Targeted at Children to lure them into watching and becoming addicted to Porn at an early age. I assume that Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., DC Comics, and Liberty Media Holdings know Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch is profiting from the use of Superman and other action figures, superheros in their Porn Movies. These are movies containing the "brands", "trademarks" of Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics. And they are PORN directed toward children in the search engines and video search sites.

It is the responsibility of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics to protect their brands, and their shareholders, so it seems safe to assume that either Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics is suing Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch regarding Superman Porn and other Action Figure, Comic Porn, Superhero Porn and the use of their Copyright, their Trademark. OR Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics has licensed Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch to market porn directly to Children with the Trademark of Superheros, Action Heros, Comic.

Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics know about this licensing? Do the shareholders of Liberty Media Holdings, Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., and DC Comics also profit from the use of "company" trademarks in Porn Parodies, Superman Movies?

"Warner Bros. Wins ‘Superman’ Copyright Case Against Joe Shuster’s Heirs"
http://screenrant.com/superman-copyright-lawsuit-shuster-warner-bros-wins/

DC Comics, Inc. DC Entertainment is a company of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which itself is owned by Time Warner. DC Comics produces material featuring a large number of well-known characters, including Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, the Flash, Aquaman, Hawkman, Hawkgirl, Green Arrow, Black Canary and the Martian Manhunter, along with such superhero teams as the Justice League and the Teen Titans, as well as antagonists such as Lex Luthor, the Joker, Darkseid, the Riddler, Catwoman, Brainiac and the Penguin. Many of these are used in Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun's Porn Parody which is superheros, action figures, engaging in Porn.

Vivid Entertainment is in the search for Comic Book Movie, Fan Sites, Action Figure News, and this is PORN, this is not to lure in adults. It is targeted at getting children interested in and addicted to porn, through their favorite action figures, Superheros, and these Superheros are Copyrighted by Disney and Warner Bros.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/ActionFigureNews/news/?a=25748
This site also sells Superman, Comic Book merchandise.

Comics and Porn, is this an image that Warner Bros. wants? Do Warner Bros., Time Warner, DC Comics shareholders Support this?

The Search Term DC Comics should by copyrighted by Time Warner, Warner Bros., yet nothing is done to protect the DC Comics Brand from being used in Porn that is directed at Children. Liberty Media Holdings attorney sues people often for the smallest possibly infringement, so surely this HUGE use of a Time Warner Inc. Brand, is licensed and profited from by Liberty Media Holdings, TWX, Warner Bros. and Time Warner or Liberty Media Holdings attorneys Jordan Rushie and Mark Randazza would be suing them right?

Instead Liberty Media Holdings attorney Jordan Rushie is attacking a blogger who is exposing the porn industry, and speaking out about the iViewit Technology and Liberty Media Holdings attorney Marc Randazza is suing that same blogger, me, and alleging a Trademark infringement and he wants 100,000 for each alleged infringement and massive attorney fees.

Below is a Vivid Entertainment, Steven Hirsch Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube and easily found in the search engines by your children.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usDo5H7mGp0
This Superman Porn "official teaser" comes up in the YouTube search right along side your other Superman, Superhero and Action Figure Videos.

A the end of this Superman Video is a *Disclaimer* "This is a parody movie. Superman is a registered trademark of DC Comics, a general partnership, composed of Warner Communication Inc. and E.C. Publications, Inc. This video is not sponsored, endorsed, by or affiliated with DC Comics, Warner Communications Inc. or E.C. Publications, Inc. or any other person or entity affiliated with any of them."

Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. is the owner of the Superman trademark, so this seems to be saying that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. does not endorse the movie, however, that certainly does not mean that Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. and Liberty Media Holdings is not profiting from the movie. How can they not be, with the massive aggression that these Porn Industry, Copyright Troll Attorneys such as Jordan Rush Marc Randazza use against the tiniest of infringement on imaginary trademarks. Surely if there was a trademark issue with Superman, then Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. part owner Liberty Media Holdings would have their thug attorneys sue Vivid Entertainment.

If Warn Bros., Time Warner Inc. Disgraces the Brand, Misuse the Copyright, Tarnish the Trademark, does the rights revert back to the Siegel Family, the Heirs, Laura Siegel Larson

Another Superman Porn Movie Trailer in YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gMnC15g0qQ


Liberty Media Holdings and Porn Companies, Porn Attorneys, Some Legal Cases. There are many cases where Jordan Rushie, Marc Randazza, J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green sue people for allegedly infringing on Liberty Media Holdings copyrighted material.

http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/02/copyright-lawsuit-is-alleged-to-be.html

http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/tag/liberty-media-holdings/

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copyright-lawsuits/pennsylvania-eastern-district-court/102558/liberty-media-holdings-llc-v-john-does-1-265/summary/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/101705882/4-17-2012-Motion-to-Take-Pre-Complaint-Discovery


More about the Massive Shareholder Liability over the iViewit Technology Infringment by Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc.
http://www.crystalcox.com/2011/07/warner-bros-signed-non-disclosure.html

Liberty Media Holdings Attorney, also Corbin Fisher and other Porn Companies, Marc J. Randazza SUED me, blogger Crystal Cox, and iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein claiming that he had a Trademark on the name Marc Randazza.  Manwin sued Nicholas Bulgin regarding ManwinSucks.com, yet these these Porn Companies profiting massively from a real Trademark is somehow overlooked. So I assume that the Trademark owner is profiting or they would sue.

Porn Attorney Marc Randazza also claimed in Randazza V. Cox, Bernstein that he wanted the Courts to STOP me, Blogger Crystal Cox from titling blogs and YouTube Videos with the name Marc Randazza, so I would not come up in the search for his name when talking about him. Yet SUPERMAN, Porn, Comics, DC Comics all come up in Porn Searches and are definitely a well known, household name Trademark.

Liberty Media Holdings owns part of Time Warner Inc., therefore owns part of the Superman Trademark Profit, and DC Comics yet Liberty Media Holdings sues people who download porn from their sites, who allegedly infringe on their copyright?  Liberty Media Holdings would SUE Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch and Axel Braun if they were not getting ROYALTIES.

So the question then becomes do the shareholders of Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., Liberty Media Holdings know what they are profiting from Porn directed at children through their favorite super hero or action figure?

Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about the iViewit Technology Infringement and the massive liability to them?

Do Liberty Media Holdings Shareholders, Time Warner Inc. Shareholders, Warner Bros. shareholders know about being named in a 100 Billion Dollar Racketeering Lawsuit filed in February of 2013?


Also Check Out



https://www.facebook.com/iviewit/posts/133089426862083

http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html

iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf


http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/

http://www.iviewit.tv/


Full RICO Filing

iViewit Supreme Court Case

iViewit SEC Complaint

iViewit Motion to ReHear

Monday, January 5, 2015

Randazza Legal Group and Marc Randazza abuse the Power of the Courts for their own intellectual property thieving and First Amendment Rights Violating Motives.

Attorney Marc Randazza uses Protective Orders, Civil Lawsuits and TRO's to Chill Speech, Suppress Speech, Violate First Amendment Rights and all at the same time as falsely advertising to be a Free Speech Advocate and First Amendment Rights, FOR ALL, attorney.

Las Vegas based Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group uses the courts as his private play ground to bully those who dare to exercise their Free Speech rights and speak out about him, his "friends" and "associates", his law firm or his wife.

Marc Randazza does this while at the same time, PRETENDING, to advocate Free Speech for ALL.

Marc Randazza uses Protective Orders to get GAG ORDERS on those who exercise their First Amendment rights talking about him, or those who create a PARODY making fun of him. He does this while at the same time flat out lying that he is an advocate for the Free Speech rights of ALL.

Marc Randazza is certainly NOT for the First Amendment rights of Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers NOR of me, Crystal Cox.  

Marc Randazza used an unconstitutional preliminary TRO's (alleged "Temporary" Restraining Orders"" to simply shut down massive blogs (speech) of mine and that "TEMPORARY" was well over 2 years now. He flat out misused the courts to STEAL intellectual property, STEAL search engine ranking, and suppress speech. He did this claiming Trademark rights. Yet they were clearly blogs that were "Gripe Site" and "Sucks Sites" of which he has previously defended.

Marc Randazza not only STOLE my intellectual property, my search engine ranking, and violated my First Amendment rights but he used all my decades of work and proprietary knowledge against me pointing the servers illegally to a blog post on his blog and his buddies blogs lying about me, defaming me, falsely accusing me of criminal activity and ruining my real estate career, my quality of life, my online business and ALL because he did not APPROVE of the online "SPEECH" I was using in griping about him and his wife.


Marc Randazza files a protective order with the courts, files a civil suit then uses that to ATTACK his target. He is then an officer of the court and can pry into your private life as deep as he wants. He uses this power to harass your church, publicize your home address, get your bank and wire records, get your phone records, harass clients and customers, harass and bully ex's, constantly question you, have you followed and abuse the power of the courts to ruin your life, business and relationships.

Attorney Marc Randazza, who is allegedly connected to the mafia. Marc Randazza DOES protect the rights of pedophiles to write guides on pedophiles, does associate with and said to employ Sean Tompkins and Ari Bass (Michael Whiteacre) to bully, threaten, stalk, harass and put "real fear" into those who Marc Randazza does not like, Marc Randazza does talk about the death of his targets and he bullies, threatens, lies about, criminal defames his targets such as me and Alexandra Mayers. He does REAL STUFF to ruin lives, and yet he pretends he is the victim, scared of us and the courts, judges give him his way, give him an illegal and unethical protective order which he uses as a GAG ORDER and a way to suppress SPEECH and steal intellectual property.

Yet Attorney Marc Randazza claims to be afraid of a woman me, and another woman in a separate protective order, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and this fear is so bad he gets a protective order against us when he is the one that is breaking the law, bullying us, intimidating us, violating our rights and abusing the courts to do it.

Attorney Marc Randazza abuses the power of the courts, is above the law and the question becomes why? Why do Las Vegas judges give Marc Randazza super powers in the courts to abuse, stalk, bully, steal intellectual property, intimidate, threaten and all with the power of a TRO / a Protective Order that he gets the minute he asks based on his "STATED" fear or his STATED Trademark Violation. This is CLEARLY against the law but Attorney Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group's victims have NO RIGHTS in a COURT OF LAW. Only Mr. Randazza has rights and these rights violate the constitution of the United States and violate the LAW. Oh well Attorney Marc Randazza controls your courts and DOES NOT ABIDE BY THE LAW. That Fact sure seems to be clear to me.

Las Vegas based Lawyer Marc Randazza falsely claims to be an advocate for Free Speech Rights for ALL and for the First Amendment Rights of ALL even pedophiles and even in the domain name GlenBeckRapedANDmurderedayounggirlin1990.com YET he suppresses the speech of those he does not like or approve of and he uses the power of the courts to do it.

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be a Trademark expert, he falsely advertises his expertise in this field, yet he FALSELY sued me, Crystal Cox, his former client claiming a Trademark violation against him, his wife, and his toddler.  Randazza did this with willful and wanton intend to harass, bully, intimidate, cause harm and ruin the life of his target, in this case me, his former client Blogger Crystal Cox. Randazza either is NOT a Trademark Law expert or he is and he used that expertise to commit fraud on the court and sue a former client claiming a cause of action of Trademark Law of which he clearly had no legal rights.

Why? He did this in order to try and shut me up because I was exercising my free speech rights and First Amendment rights to have gripe sites against  him, call his wife a slut and review his legal practice and law firm with sucks sites. Randazza STOLE those sites and blogs that were in the top 10 search for Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group and he used a protective order, a TRO to do it. No muss, No fuss; he says he is in fear and the courts simply give him his wish, it's MAGIC.

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims to be an expert in intellectual property law yet he did not own his Trademark nor his wife, nor child and sued me claiming he had a Trademark. Marc Randazza did not even own his name as a dotcom yet FALSELY advertised that he is a Domain Name expert.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group make False claims daily, yet for some reason they get away with it. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group are not ethical, do not operate under the color of law as far as I see it and are unconstitutional. Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group have super powers in the courts, it seems, and are oddly protected by Judges across the United States and probably in other countries. And for some reason they still get away with their INJUSTICE.

I will soon be filing a DOJ and FBI complaint regarding all of these issues. As Soon as I can. 

I BELIEVE it is against the law to make False Claims in Advertising.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3729

Randazza makes fraudulent claim of being an advocate for ALL speech, False Claims of being a Trademark Expert and Intellectual Property Expert. In my Opinion of Course.

Randazza Legal Group Makes False Claims, as proven in the willful, wanton, deliberate with full knowledge of it's falsehood frivolous, invasive, rights violating legal actions against  Crystal Cox, Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, Desi Fox / Diana Grandmason and Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Inventor. 

I say NO more Randazza Above the LAW.


Please Send tips to ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com 



Sunday, December 28, 2014

Marc J. Randazza Says; "Ms. Mayers got sued because she falsely accused my wife of engaging in prostitution." Ms. Mayers did not ACCUSE, that is another Dumbdazza Lie. Jennifer Randazza is however, ALLEGEDLY, a SLUT.

What an ASSHOLE.

A Lying, Abusive, Overreaching, Unconstitutional, Hypocritical Attorney ASSHOLE.

Asshole Marc Randazza sued me, Blogger Crystal Cox, allegedly for a Trademark he did not have and his wife and baby did not have either. The court motions easily show that later the whiny ass claimed I Defamed him, then it was extortion. 

Guess he can't make up his befuddled mind what I did to him, just that he is BUTTHURT and intends to use the power of the COURTS in a Clear Abuse of Process and VIOLATION of civil rights, privacy rights and constitutional rights to "Teach me a Lesson".

Marc Randazza says, if you are gunna love Free Speech ya gotta love it all Howie, ya can't just love some of it. Well ya know I mean except for ummm calling my drunken tryst gal a SLUT well that's not protected speech especially if you think that she may have been some sort of alleged escort that may have allegedly had drunken, unprotected sex with me in Cabo.. that's different.

Conceived in Cabo with a Porn Attorney in a Drunken Tryst and NOT a SLUT according to the investigative research team at the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm? Really? R U Sure?


So funny Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group harasses churches, threatens to kill people from what I have heard going around, he stalks, he bullies, he sues, he intimidates, he supports pedophiles, racists and much worse. Yet he don't like his wife being called a SLUT or any insinuation that she may have ever been a prostitute? REALLY? Say What?


How Offensive really is SLUT to a Guy who Defended Rush Limbaugh 
for Calling Sandra Fluke a SLUT. WoW. And I would say, in my ALLEGING Opinion,
 that there is WAY more evidence to support a case of Jenny bo Benny Randazza being 
a SLUT then Sandra Fluke. Just Sayin'



He himself says he knocked the Bitch up in a Trunken Tryst. Ok he called her by another name, but that's how I see it. Still he said he knocked her up while drunk and a picture of a mixed drink saying where babies come from. Real proud DADDY. And WOW did you see the picture he posted of he, the MOMMY, she looks like she is 12 years old, check it out.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/

Yet he is all proud of getting her DRUNK and knocking her up.

Makes you wonder what was in that drink? Makes you wonder why she was there with that dirty old man, a well known porn attorney and having unprotected SEX. Really? WOW. Why?

It sure does wreak of escort service to me but hey what do I know? NOT a THING.

At any rate, it is at the very LEAST irresponsible to have sex with this PORN ATTORNEY without protection and while drunk out on some Mexican beach. And YEPPERS better make an honest woman of her??? WOW how does that work? By Marrying a Moron, Lying, Hypocritical abusive, EVIL porn attorney? I say NOT.


Marc Randazza  says ya gotta love all speech and defends those who call other "wives" names and defends the most horrible, dark deeding folks of society yet gets his nutz in a grind over insinuations that his young hottie ever engaged in any kind of escorting? Really? Chill Dude.. Kick Back, have a Dube. CHILLAX.

More on the Whole Drunken Tryst with the Slut. Oh I many with the NICE, very young looking respectable woman, Jennifer RandazzaJennifer Brochey Randazza, who had unprotected SEX with a Porn Attorney and was NOT an ESCORT, not on a PAID TRIP and is in NO WAY a Prostitute of ANY Kind, just to set the record STRAIGHT.

Page 14 of this Court Exhibit
http://www.alexandramayers.com/files/05.pdf


http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/
OR
https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/

"Mrs. Legal Satyricon" in the Photo in the above blog post of Mr Randazza, well that is Jennifer Brochey Randazza, the Baby Mamma that sued Monica Foster "Ms. Mayers" for allegedly saying she was a prostitute. But more like insinuating she was a prostitute and saying she was a SLUT. Ya know all that SPEECH ya got love ALL OF IT. According to Big Daddy Mr. Randazza whose law firm represented his SLUT wife to sue a blogger calling names and exercising Free Speech.

http://www.popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Marc-Randazza-Blog.-Crystal-Cox-Vs.-Marc-Randazza.-Randazza-Legal-Group-Corbin-Fisher.pdf

Marc Randazza wishes Monica Foster, Ms. Mayers DEATH, outs her car, her home address and well really wants her dead and gone. He harasses her, names her in my legal action, lies about her. And if she fights back well there there SHE gets sued by the big bad ALLEGED mafia connected pedophile supporting, Free Speech NOT loving attorney aKa Fucknut Marc Randazza.

Marc Randazza is the KING of CAN Dish it OUT but Wa Wa Can't Take it.


STOP WHINING

Stop Using the Federal Court System to Seek Revenge
on the WOMEN you don't like exercising Free Speech
about your big dumb ass and hypocritical legal practice.

In the Randazza v. Cox Lawsuit, Marc Randazza claims that I, Crystal Cox am a Public Figure. And well you bet I am. I was in newspapers around the world and every United Stat

Jennifer Randazza PURPOSELY interjected herself into the limelight by suing me, Crystal Cox, a PUBLIC Figure. Then she claims she is not a public figure and SUES "Ms. Mayers" what a CROCK.

SUE a PUBLIC FIGURE; BECOME A PUBLIC FIGURE


Here is where Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group Says, "Ms. Mayers got sued because she falsely accused my wife of engaging in prostitution."

https://twitter.com/marcorandazza/status/455363376512651264

Archive of RandazzaNews.com that Marc Randazza said I owned then Sued "Ms. Mayers" for It.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140601093554/http://www.randazzanews.com/

Page 2 of this one talks of the Death to Monica and outing her Car Details
http://www.alexandramayers.com/files/05.pdf


Check out this "Ms. Mayer's" Video about the situation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m25PWTUHbpw&index=1&list=PLRsW-MQATyP4N5OQWgkl4k-qKuf-AUyFr



See the THING is HERE "Mr. Randazza" if you are going to love SPEECH ya gotta love all that SHIT.. Right? NOPE not if you are talkin' bout my wife and kids, I don't like that shit. Wa Wa.

There is tons online regarding Jennifer being a Slut, or in a drunken tryst. And this was online BEFORE Monica Foster "Ms Mayers" ever spoke of Jennifer Randazza.

Therefore she had no malice, as it sure seems there is information online to suggest that Jennifer Randazza is indeed a SLUT. And she sure is a Public Figure after TWO years of her lawsuit against a PUBLIC FIGURE, Me.

The MERE act of Suing Me made her a PUBLIC Figure if Nothing Else; DUH

Daddy Danzza went on NPR and other high profile news outlets and talked or shall I say flat out LIED and whined about me, Crystal Cox. He talked of he, his baby, and his wife suing me, Crystal Cox - a Public Figure.

Marc Randazza is a Public Figure and yet in all this PR, legal case and media outlets talking of this, Jennifer Slutdanzza claims to NOT be a Public FIGURE. WOW? that can't be True? Is she really claiming that? as a Matter of Law? WOW.

Even if Dizzy Dumbdazza aKa Jennifer Randazza was NOT a Public Figure before she, her baby, and her PUBLIC FIGURE attorney Marc Randazza sued me, a Public Figure well then she certainly was as of Nov. 2012 when THEY sued me, Crystal Cox a PUBLIC Figure and talked about it in all media outlets that would listen and report.

As a matter of LAW, Jennifer Randazza interjected herself into a PUBLIC Figure status by SUING Me, a Public Figure.

The media around it has continued for over 2 years now. Then WOW sue "Ms. Mayers" and claim DITZY Dazza is NOT a Public Figure. WOW. How about NOT.



OBEY THE LAW ~ Tell the Truth

public figure
n. in the law of defamation (libel and slander), a personage of great public interest or familiarity like a government official, politician, celebrity, business leader, movie star, or sports hero. Incorrect harmful statements published about a public figure cannot be the basis of a lawsuit for defamation unless there is proof that the writer or publisher intentionally defamed the person with malice.

Public Figure
A description applied in Libel and Slander actions, as well as in those alleging invasion of privacy, to anyone who has gained prominence in the community as a result of his or her name or exploits, whether willingly or unwillingly. If a plaintiff in a libel or slander action qualifies as a public figure, he or she must show that the libelous or slanderous conduct of the defendant was motivated out of actual malice as required in the case of new york times co. v. sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964).


Here is the Defamation Complaint Filed, More Like a Nevada SLAP Suit. 
Yes Posted on .. Never the Less, This is how Randazza SUPPRESSES Speech




















Monica Foster ( "Ms. Mayers" )
http://www.monicaf.com/reply.pdf

Court Exhibit
http://www.alexandramayers.com/files/05.pdf


SUING A PUBLIC FIGURE THEN GOING ON NPR AND TALKING ABOUT IT IN MEDIA, WELL JENNIFER RANDAZZA IS A PUBLIC FIGURE AND I ALLEGE A SLUT


More on the Randazza SLAPP Suit against "Ms Mayers", a Porn Industry INSIDER and Investigative Blogger EXPOSING the Porn Industry.

http://www.firstamendmenttalk.com/?p=369

http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2014/04/debt-bondage-sex-trafficking-randazza.html?zx=a90161ea6d375421

http://monicaf.com/site/?p=1888

Monica Foster ( "Ms. Mayers" )
http://www.monicaf.com/reply.pdf




Randazza vs. Cox SLAPP Suit, Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

Crystal Cox Counter Claim Against Marc Randazza
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GTxOuEb5WKdli0KQy5Ic7zHvVPQDZYRIDnG8jrBlfhM/edit



Marc Randazza Says Ya Gotta Step Back, and Ya Gotta Love ALL Speech


Comedian Crystal Cox Soon to Report On the Following:


Slutty Housewife SUES Powerful Public Figure, Blogger Crystal Cox and becomes Public Figure. Husband, Media Whore, get's his gang stalking, alleged mafia connected Porn Law Firm to represent her in suing bad girl blogger "Ms. Mayers" for implying an alleged slutty-tution on a drunken tryst that led to an inevitable knocking up of an innocent tramp after reportedly drinking a mixed drink as shown on daddy danza's blog post about the amazing drunken conception.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/



Baby Sues Blogger for Calling Mom a Slut
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html



Baby Mamma sues Graphic Artist and Investigative Blogger reporting on her husband's support of pedophiles and human trafficking, for a parody Graphic 30 years into the future.


Baby Daddy is a Free Speech Attorney and alleged First Amendment Adovocate and uses his power over the courts to Abuse Process and bully, harass, and suppress SPEECH he does not like of Women alleging his drunken tryst hottie is a slut that may or may not have been possibly allegedly hired to escort his dumb, old man, porn attorney ass to Cabo where a spontaneous drunken tryst broke out on a Mexican beach after a mixed drink had been swallowed by the mother, according to reports by the father on the scene.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/
STAY TUNED

Monday, December 22, 2014

Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism - Time for the TRUTH and to STOP Lies in Media to Protect Evil. Do your Homework. EXPOSE Corruption EVERYWHERE. Start a Blog, Video Events, Post Documents of Proof; YOU are the NEWS. YOU are the Media.

Outfoxed • Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism • FULL DOCUMENTARY • BRAVE NEW FILMS

Stop Believing your Television News; STOP LOOK LISTEN

Fear, Censorship, Flat out Lies and 
So many Believed Blindly; STOP


Start a Blog, Be the REAL NEWS in your Area.


Take Videos, Record Events and Cops, Do Press Releases Yourself, Take Videos of YOU talking about what is really going on in your town, your local government and what you know and are seeing. Post Documents and Video of PROOF. 



You are The REAL MEDIA.



YOU ARE THE NEWS

Friday, December 12, 2014

CounterDefendant Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS "there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant" (Blogger Crystal Cox)

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS;

"there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant, no contract existed for representation of Counterclaimant, and Counterdefendant had not committed to the representation of Counterclaimant. "

Source
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.220.0.pdf
(Page 3)

So if there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group act in telling Eugene Volokh that a settlement was best for Cox, that he would "bow out", or offer a co-counseling relationship?

If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group negotiate a "settlement" with opposing counsel that he decided was in my best interest?

If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell other First Amendment Attorneys that he represented me, and pretty much had it handled, so they would not contact me to represent me?

If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group take it upon himself to try and reword a court opinion or something action to change my ruling in a way that would benefit his present and future clients, mostly in the Porn Industry?

If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell Eugene Volokh that he indeed was my attorney in this matter, then offer that possibly Eugene Volokh could co-counsel?

So Randazza says he was not my attorney and had "no attorney-client relationship" yet he made all these actions, discussions, offers, negotiations on "my behalf", REALLY?  And that is not a violation of law or constitutional rights in any way?

So CLEARLY Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent me, Crystal Cox.

Then after this REPRESENTATION when I fired him for lying, being a pompass ass, violating my constitutional rights, berating me, talking a deal behind my back, lying about what I wanted the outcome to be and other reasons then he used his legal knowledge, my proprietary information, my legal strategy, my private information and information he gained through representation; to defame me, harass me, bully me, intimidate me, ruin my quality of life and he used his media connections to accuse me of crimes in which I had no adjudication or due process on in any way and simply ruined my life, attacked me, violated my privacy rights, harassed and violated the rights of my sources, sued me and my sources, and engaged in conspiracy with a large amount of legal bloggers, lawyers, investigators, online media, NPR, Forbes, and even Judges.


After this Clear REPRESENTATION, Marc Randazza sued my sources that were reporting on him such as Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers and Desi Foxx aKa Diana Grandmason, he violated there and my privacy rights along with Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Randazza got my phone records, travel information, bank information, home address, names and contacts of customers and clients, information on all my domain names and intellectual property, information on my church mission, wire information, personal private information and contacts and put this in the public domain in legal cases and media to further harass and attack me. All this and he was MY ATTORNEY.

He even bullied, harassed and threatened my friends, clients, ex's, customers, church, insiders, sources and others to get information about me and put fear and intimidation into them.

Marc Randazza DID have and  attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant" (Blogger Crystal Cox) AND he clearly abused his power and privilege as an officer of the courts and the legal process. As well as used his CLOUT as an attorney to DESTROY my life knowingly with willful and wanton, clear intent in a clear abuse of power and process over a former client.

More on this Topic of Did Marc Randazza Represent Crystal Cox as her attorney or NOT?

http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-randazza-again-admits-to-have-been.html

Full Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

Bob Garfield of NPR and Bob Garfield is a Randazza Legal Groupie flat out lying about and defaming ME, Crystal Cox. Randazza DID not WIN, he stole my intellectual property and online content.

"The blogger Crystal Cox has also targeted First Amendment lawyer Marc Randazza, his wife, and their toddler. Bob spoke to Randazza in the Spring of 2012 about how Cox's actions were testing his free speech values. Since then, Randazza decided to take her to court and won. (He told us this week that his legal strategy had nothing to do with the content of Cox's speech and were instead based on domain law. His court arguments are available upon request, for free, if you ever find yourself in Cox's cross hairs). Randazza also blogs at The Legal Satyricon."

Source
http://www.onthemedia.org/story/combating-bad-speech-more-speech/

BOB Garfield is a LIAR LIAR Pants on FIRE. And did NO Fact Checking

Randazza did NOT WIN, he got an Unconstitutional TRO and STOLE Domain Names. He sued to SHUT ME UP and NOTHING to do with Domain Law. NPR has aided and abetted Marc Randazza to target, harass, criminal defame and bully COX and Randazza was Cox's former attorney.

I Expose BAD GUYS BOB, I do not Extort. I Tell on them. You however aid and abet lawyers and law firms who support human trafficking, racists and pedophiles such as Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group.

Expose the Gang Stalking Group of Attorneys, Law Firms, Judges, Legal Bloggers and Media that aid and abet Marc Randazza. I call them the Randazza Legal Groupis.

A bit More on Marc Randazza Hypocrisy

http://ethicscomplaint.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group.html

http://randazzalegalgroupies.blogspot.com/2014/12/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html

Check out the Full Docket Below of Randazza v. Cox and the Counterclaim of Defamation and Malpractice against  Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group 
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group has been sued by Blogger Crystal Cox for Malpractice and Defamation. Marc J. Randazza claims he did not represent Crystal Cox.

Blogger Crystal Cox Sued attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group for Malpractice and Defamation. Marc Randazza claims under oath to the courts, and as an officer of the court being an attorney, that he did NOT represent Crystal Cox.


In an admitted conversation with Eugene Volokh, Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group agreed to "bow out", If I wanted Eugene Volokh UCLA Law Professor to represent me in the case. 

So in this private conversation between them and without my, the clients, knowledge or consent, the questions begs "Why would he have to "bow out" if he did not believe he was my attorney or was not acting as my attorney" ?

Why would one attorney tell another attorney they will bow out of a case if they have no representation of the person they are claiming they will "bow out" in regard to? Or connection to the case?

An attorney would not have to "bow out" and STOP his negotiations if he did not think he was representing that person, that "client".

Attorney Marc Randazza DID represent Crystal Cox, me, and he did act unethically, and I allege illegally and he violated my constitutional rights and rights as a client.



Below you See Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group stating that he told Eugene Volokh he would "bow out". 

You also CLEARLY see that Randazza was talking of a "settlement" being in my best interest and of allowing Volokh to co-counsel. 

Yet Randazza CLAIMS he did not Represent Me, Crystal Cox


INTERROGATORY NO. 21:

Did you have phone conversations with Eugene Volokh and state that you represented Cox and discuss with him your strategy, or a deal you were trying to make with the opposition, Plaintiff’s attorney David Aman?




RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:

"Counterdefendant objects to Interrogatory No. 21 on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, overly broad, not limited in time and scope, and seeks information which is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Counterdefendant further objects because this interrogatory is in excess of the 25 allowable
interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As a result,
Counterdefendant is not required to respond to the same. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Counterdefendant responds as follows:

Counterdefendant spoke with Eugene Volokh in December 2011. 

Randazza informed Volkokh that if he was going to represent Cox, that Randazza would gladly "bow out", and defer to Volokh to handle the case.

Volokh, however, said that he would prefer that Randazza co-counsel the case with him due to Volokh’s stated lack of litigation experience. Counterdefendant and Volokh discussed possible strategies that he and Volokh thought might be good ideas during that call.

Counterdefendant and Volokh both discussed the fact that Cox’s interests would be better served through settlement."

Source ( Page 18 )
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiM0hkaW9IYVV2VGc/view?usp=sharing

(Riddled with Lots of Other LIES, more on that Later)



Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group not only agrees to "bow out" but admits to be in a negotiation with Eugene Volokh to Co-Counsel. 

What gave Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that special power and privilege, that client / attorney privilege, if he did not believe he was already representing me, Crystal Cox? 

How could he legally or ethically offer to co-counsel with Volokh on my behalf, if he did not represent me and without my, the CLIENTS, specific permission?

Also, why would Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group discuss co-counsel with Eugene Volokh if he had not already told Eugene Volokh that he represented me, Crystal Cox?

Why in the world would Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group discuss a "settlement" with Eugene Volokh as admitted above, if he did not believe he was representing me, Crystal Cox or acting as my attorney? 

Marc Randazza clearly admits to discussing that a settlement is best for me, and seemingly who cares what I, the client thinks. He admits to being my counsel and saying he will bow out. He offers to allow Volokh to co-counsel. And yet tells the courts he did not represent me, Crystal Cox? Really? WOW.

You clearly see above, Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group admitting to negotiating on behalf of Cox, in a way to see if a "deal" could be made with the Plaintiff in my case. 

Yet Marc Randazza did not get my permission to do so nor tell me the deal. He took my strategy, led me to believe I could trust him then went to the other side in my case and tried to make a deal that I DID NOT WANT. 

If he was not engaged in all of the above as my attorney than under what power, privilege and authority was he doing this?

More eMails, Discovery, Declarations, 
Motions and information on the 
"Did Marc Randazza Represent Crystal Cox" Saga 


Coming SOON.


More on the Hypocrisy of Attorney Marc Randazza
http://randazzalegalgroupies.blogspot.com/2014/12/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html

Check out the Full Docket Below of Randazza v. Cox and the Counterclaim of Defamation and Malpractice against  Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group 
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html